Tuesday, 15 June 2010

Non White residents get 6 votes each in suburban NY election

PORT CHESTER, N.Y. – Arthur Furano voted early — five days before Election Day. And he voted often, flipping the lever six times for his favorite candidate.

Furano cast multiple votes on the instructions of a federal judge and the U.S. Department of Justice as part of a new election system crafted to help boost Hispanic representation.

Voters in Port Chester, 25 miles northeast of New York City, are electing village trustees for the first time since the federal government alleged in 2006 that the existing election system was unfair. The election ends Tuesday and results are expected late Tuesday night.

Although the village of about 30,000 residents is nearly half Hispanic, no Latino had ever been elected to any of the six trustee seats, which until now were chosen in a conventional at-large election. Most voters were white, and white candidates always won.

Federal Judge Stephen Robinson said that violated the Voting Rights Act, and he approved a remedy suggested by village officials: a system called cumulative voting, in which residents get six votes each to apportion as they wish among the candidates. He rejected a government proposal to break the village into six districts, including one that took in heavily Hispanic areas.

Furano and his wife, Gloria Furano, voted Thursday.

"That was very strange," Arthur Furano, 80, said after voting. "I'm not sure I liked it. All my life, I've heard, 'one man, one vote.'"

It's the first time any municipality in New York has used cumulative voting, said Amy Ngai, a director at FairVote, a nonprofit election research and reform group that has been hired to consult. The system is used to elect the school board in Amarillo, Texas, the county commission in Chilton County, Ala., and the City Council in Peoria, Ill.

The judge also ordered Port Chester to implement in-person early voting, allowing residents to show up on any of five days to cast ballots. That, too, is a first in New York, Ngai said.

Village clerk Joan Mancuso said Monday that 604 residents voted early.

Gloria Furano gave one vote each to six candidates. Aaron Conetta gave two votes each to three candidates.

Frances Nurena talked to the inspectors about the new system, grabbed some educational material and went home to study. After all, it was only Thursday. She could vote on Friday, Saturday or Tuesday.

"I understand the voting," she said. "But since I have time, I'm going to learn more about the candidates."

On Tuesday, Candida Sandoval voted at the Don Bosco Center, where a soup kitchen and day-laborer hiring center added to the activity, and where federal observers watched the voting from a table in the corner.

"I hope that if Hispanics get in, they do something for all the Hispanic people," Sandoval said in Spanish. "I don't know, but I hope so."

FairVote said cumulative voting allows a political minority to gain representation if it organizes and focuses its voting strength on specific candidates. Two of the 13 Port Chester trustee candidates — one Democrat and one Republican — are Hispanic. A third Hispanic is running a write-in campaign after being taken off the ballot on a technicality.

Campaigning was generally low-key, and the election itself was less of an issue than housing density and taxes.

Hispanic candidates Fabiola Montoya and Luis Marino emphasized their volunteer work and said they would represent all residents if elected.

Gregg Gregory gave all his votes to one candidate, then said, "I think this is terrific. It's good for Port Chester. It opens it up to a lot more people, not just Hispanics but independents, too."

Vote coordinator Martha Lopez said that if turnout is higher than in recent years, when it hovered around 25 percent, the election would be a success — regardless of whether a Hispanic was elected.

"I think we'll make it," she said. "I'm happy to report the people seem very interested."

But Randolph McLaughlin, who represented a plaintiff in the lawsuit, said the goal was not merely to encourage more Hispanics to vote but "to create a system whereby the Hispanic community would be able to nominate and elect a candidate of their choice."

That could be a non-Hispanic, he acknowledged, and until exit polling is done, "it won't be known for sure whether the winners were Hispanic-preferred."

The village held 12 forums — six each in English and Spanish — to let voters know about the new system and to practice voting. The bilingual ballot lists each candidate across the top row — some of them twice if they have two party lines — and then the same candidates are listed five more times. In all, there are 114 levers; voters can flip any six.

Besides the forums, bright yellow T-shirts, tote bags and lawn signs declared "Your voice, your vote, your village," part of the educational materials also mandated in the government agreement. Announcements were made on cable TV in each language.

All such materials — the ballot, the brochures, the TV spots, the reminders sent home in schoolkids' backpacks — had to be approved in advance, in English and Spanish versions, by the Department of Justice.

Conetta said the voter education effort was so thorough he found voting easier than usual.

"It was very different but actually quite simple," he said. "No problem."

Pip pip

Monday, 7 June 2010


Let us start with a basic premise. Great Britain is dying. There is no exclamation after that statement as it now must be obvious to all but the most blatant Marxists and Multiracialists. Before our very eyes, we can see our Nation and our Race in its death agonies. Rootless people with no recognition of a heritage or an identity flood our streets, in our towns and cities. Over all sits the not so Hidden Hand of the New World Order, successfully pursuing its now foreseeable and evil aim of a One World State in which EVERY nation including our own is enslaved and all races merged forcibly into one big coffee coloured humanity. If that premise is accepted, and it must be by any thinking patriot then as Nationalists we are left with only a few choices.

Give up and let our Race and Nation go to the dogs as it doing so rapidly. Try and work within the rotten and corrupt System and change it, with the very real possibility that we ourselves, once free thinking White men and women, will become through constant compromise to the forces of Internationalism, at one with them, the enemy we despise. Compromising our principles for short term gain is a deadly and dangerous road go down. The gains are short lived as the latest election has just shown all too starkly and we risk selling our souls to the very Devil we are fighting.

Lastly we can FIGHT! We can fight as our ancestors have always done, this massive invasion of our country and this destruction of our folk and land.

If we accept that the last answer - to fight long and hard and with every fibre in our bodies against what is happening then the question becomes not WHY but HOW? The answer is to organise ourselves. This the National Front has been doing since its inception in 1967. We organise; we demonstrate; we propagate our Nationalists ideas through literature and the Internet; we stand in elections both local and national - in short we try by every legal means possible to win over the hearts and minds of the native British people to the Cause of British Nationalism

Many of us in the NF - perhaps the majority of our hundreds of members have been at some time members of your party - the BNP. Indeed, the writer of this current article was a founder member of the BNP as well as being a founder member of the National Front way back in 1967. Many other NF members ( and BNP members) have also given decades of their lives to this Cause.

Why should you leave the BNP - and here I am on dangerous ground! Am I trying to split the BNP? Am I poaching members from the BNP for the NF. No I am not trying to split the BNP - it is doing that quite well without my help! Yes of course I am trying to poach members - but not all members - from the BNP because I believe quite firmly that if and when (and if seems to be only a matter of time) - they leave the BNP, then if they do not know of the National Front's welcoming mat then they may well be lost to this vital fight forever and live out their lives embittered and disillusioned by the men who have ruined what was once a great party.

The most direct answers for you leaving the BNP are simple ones. It's leadership is morally bankrupt and seems to be running the BNP as a mercantile operation, purely a vehicle for fund-raising for person or persons both known and unknown. Secondly it has jettisoned so many of its core founding principles that is no longer White Nationalist, no longer British Nationalist, and has become just another part of a System which it was founded and built to fight.

Reasons for not leaving tend to be that members have been in it a long time and have given a lot of time and effort which they do not want to see going to waste. Well my BNP friends - it has gone to waste and whatever else you put in will go to waste too. Or the other two pat answers for staying in of what most of us can quite clearly see is a doomed vessel heading for the rocks - are these:- "Something will turn up, we can change the Leadership" and "The BNP is the only show in town".

How many tries have there been to change the leadership and just how hard if not impossible does the new BNP Constitution written by just one man as a permanent sinecure for himself, will it be to change the leadership of the BNP? The answer is IT IS IMPOSSIBLE to change the leadership of the BNP. Even the arch traitor and Marxist Gordon Brown had the good grace to go when Labour crashed down in defeat at the last election but no, not this BNP leader. Wrecked after a disaster of an election, the man blames, threatens and expels everyone but himself.

Reasons why BNP members seem to be reluctant to join the Front? Its too extreme. Is it? The NF's policies are EXACTLY the same as the BNP ones were before they started being changed after John Tyndall was illegally expelled in 1999. Its got a "bad" name. Has it? The NF name is known as equally well as the BNP's. In the end the name of the National Front is worth its weight in gold in propaganda terms. The NF is sometimes thought of as 'Neo-Nazi' - in truth, the BNP gets this same label all the time no matter what policies it drops or no matter how much it panders up to Britain and the Jewish Board of puties!

The National Front is a "Broad Church" movement. This means it is a Movement for ALL patriots, from hard-line White Nationalists through British Nationalists to Powellites - it encompasses all shades of patriotic opinion - all it asks of its members is that they believe in our basic principles of Race and Nation.

The BNP we do not want? We don't want the time wasters. We don't want those who blow with the wind when the going gets tough. We don't want the "Civic Nationalists" with their ignorance of Race and the vital part it plays in this Struggle. We DO want those BNP members - the great majority - who are sick of financial double dealing; proscriptions and witch hunts; expulsions and character assassination when they cross the inept leadership.

The Front is for every White Patriot in this land who truly believes in his or her Race and Nation - stop making excuses and join the National Front today!

Eddy Morrison, National Front (2010)

Pip pip

When justice and the rule of law still stood in OUR land...

We used to know how to deal with the scum of society.

One day soon we shall do so again....

Pip pip

Sunday, 6 June 2010

Fish & Chips? Think Twice in Future

Pricewise people are snatching up this fish at Morrisons and other supermarkets, it looks ok but read this item below and stop buying this fish now

The fish is from Vietnam and is also known as ( Pangasius, Vietnamese River Cobbler, White Catfish, Gray Sole )

Industrially farmed in Vietnam along the Mekong River, BASA or Pangas or whatever they're calling it, has only been recently introduced to the French market. However, in a very short amount of time, it has grown in popularity in France.

They are very, very affordable (cheap), are sold in fillets with no bones and they have a neutral flavor and texture; many would compare it to cod and sole, only much cheaper. But as tasty as some people may find it, there's, in fact, something hugely unsavory about it.

I hope the information provided here will serve as very important information for you and your future choices. Here's why it is better left in the shops and not on your dinner plates:

1. BASAS or Pangas are teeming with high levels of poisons and bacteria. (industrial effluents, arsenic, and toxic and hazardous by-products of the growing industrial sector, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), DDT and its metabolites (DDTs), metal contaminants, chlordane-related compounds (CHLs), hexachlorocyclohexane isomers (HCHs), and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) ).

The reason is that the Mekong River is one of the most polluted rivers on the planet and this is where basa/pangas are farmed and industries along the river dump chemicals and industrial waste directly into it. Avoid eating them because they contain high amounts of contamination. Regardless of Reports and recommendations against selling them, supermarkets still sell them, knowing full well that they are contaminated.

2. They freeze Basa/Pangas in contaminated river water.

3. BASA/Pangas are raised in Vietnam . Pangas are fed food that comes from Peru, their hormones ( which are injected into the female Pangas ) come from China and finally, they are transported from Vietnam to other countries .

4. There's nothing natural about Basa/Pangas - They're fed dead fish remnants and bones, dried and ground into a flour (from South America), manioc ( cassava ) and residue from soy and grains.

This kind of nourishment doesn't even remotely resemble what they eat in nature. But what it does resemble is the method of feeding mad cows ( cows were fed cows, remember? ).

What they feed basa/pangas is completely unregulated so there are most likely other dangerous substances and hormones thrown into the mix.

The basa/pangas grow 4 times faster than in nature, so it makes you wonder what exactly is in their food. Your guess is as good as mine.

5. Basa/Pangas are injected with Hormones Derived from Urine. They inject female Basa/Pangas with hormones made from the dehydrated urine of pregnant women, the female Pangas grow much quicker and produce eggs faster ( one Basa/Panga can lay approximately 500,000 eggs at one time ).

Essentially, they're injecting fish with hormones ( they come all of the way from a pharmaceutical company in China ) to speed up the process of growth and reproduction. That isn't good. And also consider the rest of the reasons to NOT eat BASA.

6. You get what you pay for - and then some. Don't be lured in by insanely cheap price of Basa/Pangas. Is it worth risking your health and the health of your family?

7. Buying Basa/Pangas supports unscrupulous, greedy corporations and food conglomerates that don't care about the health and well-being of human beings.

They are only concerned about selling as many basa/pangas as possible to unsuspecting consumers. These corporations only care about making more money at whatever cost to the public..

8. Basa/Pangas WILL make you sick - If you don't get ill with vomiting, diarrhea and effects from severe food poisoning, congratulations, you have an iron stomach! But you're still ingesting POISON not "poisson".

Final important note: Because of the prodigious amount of availability of Basa/Pangas, be warned that they will certainly find their way into other foods like imitation crab sticks, fish sticks, fish terrines, and probably in some pet food too. Just check the Ingredient List to see if Basa is one of the ingredients. Good Luck.

You have been warned !!!

Pip pip

Wednesday, 2 June 2010


The BNP Leadership have been terrified of the Your BNP page for sometime as it had almost 27,000 members. This evening they have succeeded in having it removed from Facebook. At what cost?

Make sure you join the new Facebook page here;


Pip pip