Friday, 27 February 2009

Normal service, again !!

The Linux distro I use has had a couple of very major upgrades over the last couple of weeks meaning I have had three tux machines in various phases of not working if you get my drift. This wasn't the fault of the OS but the Linux devs in their infinite wisdom decided to screw around with packages and apps that were ok to begin with and in so doing, borked them. Hopefully this is now all behind us with the last of the 'systemically non compliant' machines working (as I type in fact) so hopefully we will indeed be back to normal service after the weekend.

Fingers crossed....

Pip pip

Sunday, 22 February 2009

Virgil Griffin Dies.

MOUNT HOLLY, N.C. – The man who led a Ku Klux Klan chapter in North Carolina that was involved in a deadly 1979 clash with members of the Communist Workers Party has died.

Virgil Griffin, 64, died Wednesday at Gaston Memorial Hospital, his son James said. Griffin, a member of the Klan for 40 years, became known nationally when five communist marchers were killed in a clash with members of the Klan in Greensboro. He was imperial wizard of the Cleveland Knights of the KKK.

Griffin was tried and cleared of state murder charges and federal civil rights conspiracy charges. Several Klan members also were acquitted of murder charges in state court. In a civil trial, the Klan, the American Nazi Party and the Greensboro Police Department were found jointly liable for the wrongful deaths of the five people killed. The city paid $350,000. Five people were killed and 10 were injured during the Communist-sponsored "Death to the Klan" rally on Nov. 3, 1979.

Griffin maintained that the shootings weren't planned. He testified in 2005 at the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation Commission that his Klansmen came to the demonstration area to hold a counter-protest. When shooting broke out, Griffin testified, Communist Workers Party members were killed and not Klansmen because "my people hunt for food. Maybe God guided the bullets, I don't know." After the commission meeting, Griffin told reporters the hearings were "a total waste of time. It would have been forgotten 20 years ago if you didn't keep it in the news." Klansmen said the fight broke out between the groups because Communists tried to pull a 79-year-old Klansman out of his car.

An employee at Woodlawn Funeral Home in Mount Holly said visitation was scheduled Friday night and Griffin's funeral would be held Saturday afternoon.

Quote: "Virgil, You will be sorely missed, rest in peace dear freind. I thank YAHWEH that we were freinds." Pastor Ken Gregg.

Pip pip

Friday, 20 February 2009

Australia Calling

Reported by Derrick MacThomas


One of the top people at Australian internet service provider iPrimus has described Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's plan to censor the internet as 'like China'. Rudd's plan involves Chinese-style mandatory filtering and a secret black list of banned sites. The public will not be allowed to know what sites the government has blocked. Anyone who thinks that Australia is a free country is not up to speed with reality.

The Australia Calling webcast by Derrick MacThomas for this week which features this story and more form down under can be downloaded for your listening pleasure.
Here: Australia Calling Latest Edition.

Pip pip

Sunday, 15 February 2009

Australia Calling

Reported by Derrick MacThomas


A prominent academic has told Australians to expect to be forcibly microchipped by the Federal Government. Also, multiculturalists go into meltdown after a New South Wales detective superintendent identified Middle Eastern gangs as Australia's number-one crime problem.

The Australia Calling webcast by Derrick MacThomas for this week which features this story and more form down under can be downloaded for your listening pleasure.
Here: Australia Calling Latest Edition.

Pip pip

The synagogue of Satan

Not content with attacking Christians who wish to preserve Christianity in this country, the leaders of the Church of England have called for a blanket amnesty for asylum seekers and told Brits who lose their jobs that it is a “blessing in disguise” to be unemployed.

The CoE has called for all estimated 300,000 asylum seekers currently in Britain to be granted leave to stay in Britain indefinitely. The church’s Sanhedrin Synod voted in favour of an amnesty for those whose cases are still being decided on, and said all those who want to live here should be allowed to work.

The Rev Ruth Worsley, (1 Timothy 2:12, But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence) a priest in the diocese of Southwell and Nottingham who tabled the motion on the subject, said: “With the arrival of the credit crunch, the subsequent loss of jobs, the recent call for British jobs for British people, there is a danger that we become inward-looking and even xenophobic. But the Gospel tells us that we are not a tribal nation (Yashua the Christ quoted in Mathew 15:24, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel) but a global (2 Cor 6:17, Wherefore come out from among them and be ye separate, saith Yahweh) family.”

The Rev William Raines, of Manchester diocese, said: “The asylum system could have been designed by King Herod (The Ideumean/Canaanite jew King who instigated genocide against the true children of Israel) after reading Kafka (The Bohemian jew of Khazarian/Canaanite descent, writer of sickeningly perverse parody).” The Sanhedrin Synod voted in favour of the motion by 242 votes to 1, with 1 abstention.

Meanwhile, the Right Reverend Richard Chartres, the Bishop of London, said “people being made jobless in the recession is a blessing in disguise and can come as a relief.” (2 Thesalonians 3:8 Neither did we eat any man's bread for nought; but wrought with labour and travail night and day, that we might not be chargeable to any of you: 3:9 Not because we have not power, but to make ourselves an ensample unto you to follow us).

“Those sacked ’seem to be relieved to get off the treadmill and to be given an opportunity to reconsider what they really want out of life,” Bishop Chartres said. (2 Thesalonians 3:10 For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat. 3:11 For we hear that there are some which walk among you disorderly, working not at all, but are busybodies).

The third most senior figure in the Church added: “It is difficult to know whether to sympathise more with those who have lost their jobs or those who are left carrying even greater loads with higher targets and fewer colleagues.”

Bishop Chartres, whose job is not under threat because of the downturn, is paid £57,040 a year. However, he does not have to pay a mortgage. The bishop and his family live in a “see house” provided free by the Church in the Old Deanery, a grade one listed Wren house next to St Paul’s Cathedral. The apartment was refurbished for him at a cost of £300,000 in 1995.

Original article without quotes.

I earnestly pray the Rev Ruth Worsley, Rev Raines and Bishop Chartres et al contract some slow, pernicious and intractable brain eating disease... so be it.

Pip pip

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

Pornography - the new Opium

To subdue a population, a new and very harmful drug needed to be created, a drug capable of enslaving those who indulged in it, proving to be highly addictive

Opium was used in China at the turn of the century, to weaken the native population, so that they would easily submit to foreign rule. Pornography is being applied to the British population today to the same effect.

The BBC is pumping it into every living room, the Tabloid press is doing its part also. The internet being the worst offender.

Why then, is it so damaging?

Firstly, it undermines a persons self esteem, and leads to very addictive practices, which prove almost impossible to break. It saturates the mind, so you cant think clearly on more important subjects, like politics for example. Also, it is a proven way of leading people to commit worse crimes, like homosexuality, incest, and viewing child pornography.

Victorian Britain, was the gold standard for modesty, and morality. Coincidently, Britain then ran the largest empire the world had ever seen, spanning ¼ or the Earth. Today, with sleaze, porn and other filth everywhere, those who govern the country are unable to even provide the basics for citizens within the UK

To pave the way for this new disease, it was first necessary to undermine the Christian values on which Britain was built. British people were bombarded with decades of sleazy soap operas, fifthly comedians, and other garbage, neatly packaged up and delivered to peoples living room by the BBC, who had the cheek then to charge a license fee for this “mind manure”

Limited exposure to pornography, as first sickens a person, but very quickly they get used to it, they then start craving it in larger doses. Having gained a taste of it, from porn merchants like the BBC, people feel drawn to seek out darker and more depraved material on the internet. It represents a major loss of productivity to British Industry, with people accessing porn via the internet at work.

The epidemic of filth, which has besieged our nation, has caused a reduction in the birth rate, as young Britons seek fulfilment, not within the safety of marriage, but through self indulgence. Coupled with abortion and homosexuality, it has proved for the government an effective way of controlling population growth. Instead of experiencing the joys of fatherhood, young men are seeking out cheap thrills through media.

If anyone, within the sound of my keyboard, is caught up in this depraved game, try abstaining for a month, from pornography, and “associated practices". The increase in self esteem experienced, will forge a new pride in yourself, and a new pride in your country. Britons, never, never, never, shall be slaves. Not slaves to porn, not slaves to alien laws from Brussels and the UN, not slaves to addictive substances placed in food, but Free people. Able to govern themselves justly.

We can expect no hope from the present Labour government, in combating this tide of filth, and none of us can surely expect any help from the Conservatives, the sleaze of their members, like Stephen Milligan set a new low in the already abysmal standard of morality displayed by “Honorable members”

What can be done, to combat this plague? Like the unhygienic conditions in hospitals where disease flourishes, we need to clean up our society, starting at the top. Political parties, like Labour and Conservative which have embraced sleaze, must be replaced with those who have higher moral values. Parties like Labour and Conservative have no respect for the sanctity of life, or marriage, as shown by the legalized holocaust which occurs today in government sponsored abortion shops.

A return to Basic Christian values is recommended, like Moses led the Israelites out of captivity to freedom, we need modern leaders who can free us from our current bondage of financial debt, sleaze and unChristian values. Leaders like this can be found in the National Front. A party with the courage to take a stand on every moral issue.

Pride in your self = Pride in your country.


Pip pip

If Hitler hated Jews then all our politicians hate whites..

By Bob Whitaker

A German Nazi in the 1930s could look you straight in the eye and tell you he didn’t hate Jews. Many a Nazi could honestly say that some of his best friends had been Jews. Nazis did not identify their emotion toward Jews as “hate.” They were just acting for the common good.

You say this is crazy?

Then let us look at WHY you say this is crazy. You say Nazis hated Jews because Nazis said that no place on earth was a good place unless it was “Judenfrei” (free of Jews).

Today you are a racist unless you want EVERY white country to import Asians and Africans and mix with them. You are a racist unless you demand that ONLY White countries import other races and mix with them: “Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians.”

Unless you are a racist, you demand all that immigration and intermarriage because it will “solve the race problem.” But this “race problem” will not be “solved” in Africa or Asia. The “race problem” will be solved when ALL white countries and ONLY white countries are brown.

If you’re not a racist, you want a “white free” world. That’s not hate, that’s Idealism.

The hippies' line was, "The white race is the cancer of history." But absolutely nobody will call that hate. The hippies were Young Idealists. Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev put it best:

"The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists."

That's not hate, that is what we pay teachers to teach. Every respectable conservative agrees with Ignatiev. See * 05/10/03 : O'Reilly Agrees: the only Point of Integration is to get rid of Whites

Another reason you insist that Nazis hated Jews is because Nazis never attributed anything good to Jews, and they blamed all evil things on the Jews.

When America landed on the moon, the speech had to say that it was “a great step for Mankind.” All the food, medical miracles, and everything else that white people produce is officially the product of “mankind.” If you say that “whites” did anything good, you are a racist.

But the Nazis did give the Jews credit for doing things, bad things. And only a racist today does not give whites credit for doing every bad thing that ever happened. Whites had slavery. Whites invaded other continents. You know the drill. If you don’t know the drill, then you are a racist.

In Nazi Germany, more Jews were turned in by other Jews than by any other group of people. In the world today, whites are required to lead the charge against whites.

We’re all Nazis now.. The only thing that has changed is who the Jew is.

Pip pip

PC Terror: On Golliwogs, One-Eyed Scottish Idiots and Sending Poo Through the Post

From the desk of Sean Gabb

In England, one of those weeks has just ended that define an entire period. This is no consolation for those who have suffered, and who may yet suffer worse. But I have no doubt that it is worth describing what has happened and trying to explain what it means.

Let me begin with the facts.

First, it was reported on the 3rd February 2009 that Carol Thatcher, daughter of Margaret Thatcher, had been dismissed from her job as a BBC presenter for having called a black tennis player a golliwog. She did not say this on air, but during a private conversation. Even so, the BBC defended its decision on the grounds that any language of a "racist nature" was "wholly unacceptable".

Second, demands are rising at the moment for Jeremy Clarkson, another presenter at the BBC, to be dismissed for having called the Prime Minister a "one-eyed Scottish idiot who keeps telling us everything's fine". Various Scotch politicians and spokesmen for the blind let up an immediate chorus of horror that has resulted in a conditional apology from Mr Clarkson, but may not save his career.

Third, it was reported on the 2nd February 2009 that the comedian and Labour Party supporter Jo Brand was being investigated by the police for allegedly inciting criminal acts against her political opponents. While presenting a BBC television programme on the 16th January 2009, she rejoiced that the membership list of the British National Party had been stolen and published on the Internet. Her exact words were: "Hurrah! Now we know who to send the poo to". The natural meaning of her words was that it would be a fine idea to look up members of this party and send excrement to them through the post. The British National Party put in an immediate complaint, using the hate speech laws made during the past generation. According to a BBC spokesman, "We do not comment on police matters. However, we believe the audience would have understood the satirical nature of the remarks". It is relevant to note that Mrs Brand was present when Carol Thatcher made her "golliwog" remarks, and may have had a hand in denouncing her.

Fourth, In The Times on the 6th February, someone called Matthew Syed wrote how personally oppressed he felt by words like "golliwog", and how good it was that "society" was taking a stand against them. Two pages later, someone called Frank Skinner defended the employers in the north of England who prefer to employ foreigners on the grounds that foreigners are "better looking" and "less trouble". The possibility that he has broken one of our hate speech laws will probably never be considered.

This is a gathering of facts that occurred or were made public during one week. But if we relax the time limit, similar facts pour in beyond counting. There was, for example, the pillorying last month of one of the Queen's grandsons for calling someone a "Paki". Or, to give myself as an example, there was my BBC debate of the 16th February 2004 with Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, an Asian immigrant who seems incapable of seeing any issue except in terms of white racism. During this debate, I asked her: "Yasmin, are you saying that the white majority in this country is so seething with hatred and discontent that it is only restrained by law from rising up and tearing all the ethnic minorities to pieces?" Her answer was "Yes". It is possible she did not understand my question. It is possible she would have clarified or retracted her answer had the debate been allowed to continue. Sadly for her, the BBC immediately switched off my microphone and threw me into the street. Mrs Brown was allowed to continue uninterrupted to till the end of the programme. The hundreds of complaints received by the BBC and the Commission for Racial Equality were all either ignored or dismissed with the assurance that nothing untoward had taken place in the studio. I accept that Mrs Brown might not have meant what she said. Had I made such a comment about Asians or blacks, however, I might have been facing a long stretch in prison.

But let me return to the most recent facts. The most obvious reason why these broadly similar incidents are being treated so differently is that Jo Brand and Frank Skinner are members of the new ruling class that formally took power in 1997. They can vilify their opponents as freely as Dr Goebbels did his. Any of the hate speech laws that might – objectively read – moderate their language will be regarded as nullities. The police had no choice but to investigate Mrs Brand for her alleged offence committed live on television before several million people. But they made it clear that no charges would result. According to a police spokesman, "The chances of this going further are very remote. The idea that the BNP are claiming they are the victim of a race offence is mildly amusing, to say the least". It may be amusing. The statement itself is interesting, though, as a formal admission that law in this country now means whatever the executive finds convenient.

Carol Thatcher and Jeremy Clarkson are not members of the ruling class. They have no such immunity. Mr Clarkson may get away with his act of hate speech because he is popular and clever, and because the main object of his contempt is only the Prime Minister. Miss Thatcher may not be allowed to get away with her act. She used a word that borders on the illegal. And she is the daughter of Margaret Thatcher. She is the daughter, that is, of the woman elected and re-elected three times on the promise that she would make the British State smaller and stop it from being made the vehicle for a totalitarian revolution by stealth. Of course, she broke her promises. She did nothing to stop the takeover of the state administration by politically correct totalitarians. But there was a while when the people who actually won the cultural revolution in this country thought they would lose. They looked at her rhetoric. They noted the millions of votes she piled up in her second and third general elections. And they trembled. As said, they won. Mrs Thatcher herself is too old to suffer more than endless blackening at the hands of the victors who now comprise the ruling class. But they still tremble at the thought of how her shadow darkened their 1980s. And if they can do nothing to her now, her daughter can be ruined, and that will now be tried with every chance of success.

It might be argued that what Miss Thatcher and Mr Clarkson said was offensive, and that they are in trouble because we have a much greater regard for politeness than used to be the case. Perhaps it is offensive to say that a black man looks like a golliwog. Perhaps it is offensive to imply that Scotchmen are idiots or that people with defective sight also have defective judgement. It might be. But it might also be offensive to millions of people that the BBC – which is funded by a compulsory levy on everyone who can receive television signals – broadcasts a continual stream of nudity and obscene language; and that it pays the biggest salary in its history to Jonathan Ross, whose only public talent is for foul-mouthed buffoonery. The British ruling class – especially through the BBC, its main propaganda outreach – has a highly selective view of what is offensive...[.]

Full story

Pip pip

Monday, 9 February 2009

Australian Death Fires.... Was it Jihad?

Reports are pouring in from Australia alleging that the death forest fire in which nearly 200 people died was set by an Islamist group which had last year threatened to carry out such a terrorist act.

Suspicions that the worst wildfires ever to strike Australia were deliberately set have already led that nation’s police to declare towns incinerated by blazes to be crime scenes.

Last year in September, Islamic extremists urged Muslims via the Internet to deliberately light bush fires as a weapon of terror.

US intelligence channels identified the website calling on Muslims in Australia, the US, Europe and Russia to “start forest fires”, claiming “scholars have justified chopping down and burning the infidels’ forests when they do the same to our lands.”

The website, posted by a group called the Al-Ikhlas Islamic Network, argues in Arabic that lighting fires is an effective form of terrorism justified in Islamic law under the “eye for an eye” doctrine.

The posting - which instructs jihadis to remember “forest jihad” in summer months - says fires cause economic damage and pollution, tie up security agencies and can take months to extinguish so that “this terror will haunt them for an extended period of time.”

“Imagine if, after all the losses caused by such an event, a jihadist organisation were to claim responsibility for the forest fires,” the website says. “You can hardly begin to imagine the level of fear that would take hold of people in the United States, in Europe, in Russia and in Australia.”

When the report was made, Australian intelligence agencies confirmed that they were treating the possibility of bush fires being used as a weapon of terrorism as “a serious concern.”

The Internet posting by the little-known group claimed the idea of forest fires had been attributed to imprisoned Al Qaeda leader Abu Musab Al-Suri. It said Al-Suri had urged terrorists to use sulphuric acid and petrol to start forest fires.

* The original report on the Jihad fire threat, as published in The Australian newspaper on September 7th last year, was pulled from the Internet by that publication this afternoon. It is worth bearing in mind that as of writing, no firm evidence has yet emerged to claim that recent devastating fire has any Islamist cause.


Pip pip

Top General says arse tunnelling is 'vital to operational effectiveness'.

Army's top general makes history by addressing conference on homosexuality

The head of the British Army has made military history by addressing a conference on homosexuality, The Sunday Telegraph can reveal. General Sir Richard Dannatt, the chief of the general staff, told members of the Army-sponsored Fourth Joint Conference on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transexual Matters that homosexuals were welcome to serve in the Army.

In a speech to the conference in London on Thursday, – the first of its kind by any Army chief – Gen Sir Richard said that respect for gays, lesbian, bi-sexual and trans-sexual officers and soldiers was now "a command responsibility" and was vital for "operational effectiveness". ... ality.html

You couldn't make it up.......

Pip pip

Friday, 6 February 2009

T. Lothrop Stoddard

Who is this that goes by "Invitation only" ???.

Pip pip

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

Australia.... Pigeon Smuggler Faces Bird..

A man has been caught with two pigeons stuffed in his trousers after he got off a flight from Dubai to Melbourne.

Australian customs officials say the live birds were wrapped in padded envelopes and held to the man's legs by a pair of tights under his trousers. Officials also found two eggs in a vitamin container in the man's luggage.

Australia has strict quarantine rules on the importation of wildlife, plants and food. The man, 23, could face up to 10 years in jail. The nation's quarantine regulations are designed to protect health, agriculture and the environment.

As well as 10 years' imprisonment, the maximum sentence for wildlife smuggling includes a fine of A$110,000 (US$70,480; £48,902). Customs officials say they also seized seeds in the man's money belt and an undeclared aubergine, following the flight on Sunday.

They add that the pigeons were not endangered and that the case, as well as the birds, eggs and seeds, has been turned over to the country's Quarantine Service to assess the health risk.


Pip pip

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

Australia Calling

Reported by Derrick MacThomas


Angry young whites have smashed cars and Asian businesses on Australia Day, driven to desperation by the way that non-whites are flooding their country with the help of the traitors in government. .

The Australia Calling webcast by Derrick MacThomas for this week which features this story and more form down under can be downloaded for your listening pleasure.
Here: Australia Calling Latest Edition.

Pip pip

Normal service has been resumed

Sorry for the absence of updates over the last few days. BT managed to completely bork my land line whilst working at a nearby property which houses migrant workers. How ironic is that !!.

Pip pip