From North west nationalists blog
In the Voice of Freedom (109) a 'nom de plume' called David Bailey, who apparently hails from Canada, writes in glowing terms that the BNP learn to accept non-whites into the BNP membership. David Bailey is who exactly?. Is it Mark Collett , or more likely, Nick Griffin himself ?
In the latest issue of IDENTITY we can see that the policy of accepting non-whites into the BNP has been pushed yet again. In there, we see a 'Mr. Bill Morton' from Hayes, Middlesex gushing lyrical about accepting non-whites into the BNP, with his "more please" plea for the accepting of the unacceptable.
Of course, Bailey and Morton are 'pen names' of the agenda that Nick Griffin is pushing. Comments like these would never be published if Griffin didn't agree with their sentiments. At least, the multi-racial pursuer John Bean uses his own name for this policy in the BNP publications.
It is quite clear that the 'die has been cast', and that Griffin has decided that a BNP will not be permitted to continue as it always has done, as the focus of British nationalism. It is quite clear the direction that Griffin is leading the BNP.
We hear that a black Ghanian speaker is to lecture about the perils of the E.C. to the St.Helens branch of the BNP this week, and that Nick Griffin will be there to promote this new acceptance of the 'new ideology' now being 'pushed by Mr.Griffin'.
Nick might consider taking the black lady speaker to one of the more 'nationalist' units of the BNP, so that he and she, would get more of an understanding of the true feelings of the ideology of British nationalism.
Pip pip
Tuesday, 27 October 2009
Black Ghanian invited to address St Helens BNP?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Racism begins with our families, parents, brothers and sisters, aunts and uncles, grandparents, people we admire, respect and love.
However, as we grow and mature we come to the realization that what we were told by our family when we were children were slanted lies base on their prejudices. We realize that most people are like ourselves and not so different and want the same things, like a home, steady work, a Medicare plan and schools for our children (if you travel you will see this). We realize that most people are of good hearts and goodwill.
This reminds me of a parable from the good book where a Levite and Priest come upon a man who fell among thieves and they both individually passed by and didn’t stop to help him.
Finally a man of another race came by, he got down from his beast, decided not to be compassionate by proxy and got down with the injured man, administered first aid, and helped the man in need.
Jesus ended up saying, this was the good man, this was the great man, because he had the capacity to project the “I” into the “thou,” and to be concerned about his fellow man.
You see, the Levite and the Priest were afraid, they asked themselves, “If I stop to help this man, what will happen to me?”
But then the Good Samaritan came by. And he reversed the question: “If I do not stop to help this man, what will happen to him?”
That’s the question before us. The question is not, “If I stop to help our fellow man (immigrant) in need, what will happen to me?” The question is, “If I do not stop to help our fellow man, what will happen to him or her?” That’s the question.
This current climate of blaming others for our woes is not new. We have had this before and we have conquered it.
Remember “Evil flourishes when good men (and women) do nothing”. Raise your voices with those of us who believe we are equal and we can win this battle again.
I don't know if your a BNP member, but if you are I would wonder why. Our forebears taught us that whcih they knew to be true that we may be wise, not in our own conceits but in the knowledge of our birthright and our destiny as chldren of the most high. But we have abondoned wisdom for madness, we have abandoned truth for the lie, the lie you are peddling now. You have been decieved and brainwashed to despise your own birthright.
Don't quote jewdeo churchianity at me. Your knowledge and understanding of scripture is laughable.
The man set upon by thieves was set upon by Edomite jews. The Priest and the Levite were Edomite jews. The victim of the attack was an Hebrew Israelite of the house of Jacob.
The priest and the Levite were indeed concerned for their safety because if they were to assist an Israelite they would have been subject to summary punishment because to assist an Israelite was a criminal act so it was this which was the reason they did not render assistance.
The 'man of another race' as you put it was a Samaritan and was (as were all Samaritans) a Hebrew not an Edomite jews. The man and the Samaritan were racial kinsmen.
Yahshua said I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel, Paul admonished go not into the way of the heathen. James said to the ten tribes scattered abroad greetings. None of the apostles delivered the gospel to anyone but the racial Israelites. They did not go to China, Africa, Asia, they went only to the lost sheep.
The meaning of the parable is to assist your brother, who is your kinsman not a profane interloper or an alien. It was and still is forbidden to allow the alien who are of the seed of Cain or to allow the beast of the field to dwell amoung us.
Yahshua said:
"Give not that which is holy unto dogs lest they trample them under foot then turn again and rend you.
"It is not meat to take the childrens bread from the table and give it to dogs."
I cannot understand why nigger and paki lovers are not in the Labour Party.
But did it happen? We're all used to the bullshit factory that is NWN.
Is British Nationalist mad ?
He poses the question above, but states it is true in his own blog !
http://british-nationalist.org.uk/2009/10/african-guest-at-bnp-meeting/
Seems the 'bullshit factory' was right. Again I might add !
I wrote that article the day after I left that comment, when it was confirmed by reliable sources.
NWN are rarely correct.
Post a Comment